Many of the articles that we read in class when we first started talking about open source and open culture mentioned open science which "is a movement to make scientific research freely available". With allowing for open science, people who are trying to research scientific things to help solve a problem or cure some sort of disease would be able to have research that was found readily available to them. What I do not understand is why someone would want to implement closed science. Information that is found and that has already been researched can be readily available and could help someone tremendously but then is locked and is not available to the public. These documents need to
If I was researching articles for a project and was looking for information that could help me defend my case and I came up on an article that seemed like it had all the information I needed but it was locked and I had to pay to access it I would not pay and would continue to look for another similar article that was free and open to the public.
I found this groups presentation to be one of the more interesting ones because of the amount of researchers that their are that come across this problem. I think that it is unfair for these documents to be closed and not available to researchers because of the benefit that these documents could be gaining from many different researchers that are collaborating to get the best information for their research.
No comments:
Post a Comment